We voluntarily cope this project completely. That we can still be financially independent and talk to the representatives in Strasbourg and Brussels, organize demonstrations etc., we need your financial support. We represent the normal, european citizen. We are your voice. Every euro raises the chance for an Internet free of censorship. We thank you so much! https://www.gofundme.com/save-the-internet-info
On July, 5th the european parliament voted on the reform of copyright law in the digital domestic market. Part of this reform were the already heavy critized articles 11 & 13. These articles would've paved the way for massive censorship on the internet. That's why we started a pretty successful petition which we, thanks to a personal invitation from MeP Julia Reda, personally delivered to the representatives together with all our 736.000 signatures we had back then.
The first reform proposal to the new copyright law (articles 11 and 13) has been rejected with a 318 (53%) to 278 (47%) majority!
But this threat is not off the table right now! The plenary rejection means just that the reform has to be revamped and submitted again. A new vote is to be expected in january.
Despite a million signatures, thousands of handwritten letters to the parliamentarians, protests on the streets, flyer distributions and enlightenment work in social media the parliamentarians passed the paper to the trialogue. There it was accepted on September 12th with a 438 (62%) to 229 (33%) majority. This means that the next step to a binding guideline is reached. Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 12 September 2018
Now only two more meetings of the responsible EU-representatives with the ministers of the countries will be held, in which changes can be brought to the table, or be fought for compromise.
After this the parliament is expected to vote one last time in january. Each nation of the european union has to adjust it's own laws to the guideline. This means national laws are expected to be released in 2019/2020.
Of course we want to thank all the people who supported us. Without you we wouldn't have achieved any of this. Also we want to thank everyone who took part in the massive postage action.
Press publishers will be able to charge people for every link they paste in terms of their content. This would mean the end of smaller news portals. Say no to a link tax!
Press publishers should be obliged to charge for all links that someone places on their content. News portals would have lost reach and readership. The resulting loss of revenue would have been offset by the additional costs incurred by a license system to be administered. For many portals and publishers this would have meant economic ruin.
This form of censorship could very soon destroy the cultural normatives of the internet as we know it. The blocking of uploads, in combination with faulty algorithms, will result in so called overblocking lead by the platforms, so that they can avoid legal violations. Even the sharing of links can become a massive problem on platforms like Twitter, Facebook and others. Article 11 would only allow to show links without a preview, so that users have to blindly trust hyperlinks.
Die Minister der Länder treten mit den EU-Parlamentariern noch zwei mal zusammen und geben den daraus entstehenden letzten Entwurf dem EU-Parlament zur finalen Abstimmung. Danach werden die EU-Länder aufgefordert sein, innerhalb einer Frist von meist 12-24 Monaten die Richtlinie in ihre nationalen Gesetze einzubinden oder gänzlich neu zu gestalten. Dabei lässt ihnen die Richtlinie einen gewissen Spielraum. The ministers of the european nations will meet two times with the european parliament and hand the resulting proposal to a final vote. After this, our nations have to edit the laws and work them into their own national laws. This makes the new perfomance protection law not final.
The activities of the European Parliament are publicly accessible on its website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/. On this page you can find all information about european legislation, as well as PDF files of all submitted documents, proposals and so on.
Take the oppurtinity to oversee the work of your representatives and tell them if you're not okay with it. After all, it's also about YOUR future!
Contact your representatives! You can contact them directy to show them your discontent. E-mails often have a very good effect. That's because directly contacted people are often more willing to be convinced. You can find a list with e-mail addresses of the respective delegates here:Contact your MEP
A lead on how to get the best effect from your complaint: Be objective and polite. Insults and threats only result in rejection. Stay pragmatic and explain how unpleased you are with the matter, not with the MEP him/herself.
In the future,users such as independent research workers, journalists, regular citizens and various companies shall be refused to mine data and text. Since this is only valid for the region of the European Union, this will create obstacles and we will drop in international comparisons. In the worst case this will force companies to relocate their headquarters outside of the European Union.
The performance protection law defines that all websites that link to articles, require a license to display the well-known preview. Others can only use the isolated link. The discussion included approaches like 'attended by single words'. It remains to be seen which version will be used. Already the headline shall be seen as creative act of the creators.In return the readers have to decide in advance if they want to click on a news link or not.
The reform itself is way bigger and will also affect schools, universities and libraries. It also affects various areas, which lacked attention because of Article 11 and 13. The content of the reform is long overdue and important.
We at savetheinternet.info distance ourselves from any illegal activities! We neither support illegal activities, nor do we commission them.